The Neurological Form of FIP and GS-441524 Treatment

Published by treatfip.org on

Niels C. Pedersen, DVM PhD 

June 1, 2021 

Introduction – Neurological involvement occurs in about 5-10% of FIP cases.  This may vary between regions, as Turkish street cats appear to have a greater  incidence based on this author’s experiences. The age of onset parallels that of other forms of FIP, with most cases occurring under 3 years of age.  

Neurological FIP is considered a form of dry FIP and typical lesions of dry FIP are also observed in abdomen, thorax, or eyes in about one-half of neurological FIP cases. In contrast, neurological signs are only seen in about 5% of cats presenting with wet FIP.1  However, there has been a significant increase in neurological FIP in cats on GS-441524 treatment for other forms of FIP. Neurological FIP is also a common cause of relapse in cats that have completed treatment for non neurological FIP.  

Clinical signs– Neurological FIP presents in two forms, primary and secondary.  Cats with primary disease present for evaluation of abnormal neurological signs. However, generalized signs of ill-health are common, including failure to thrive,  weight loss, lethargy and inappetence. Fever may be apparent or inapparent.  About one-half of cats with primary neurological FIP will also have identifiable lesions outside of the central nervous system (CNS) and blood tests will be more typical of systemic FIP. However, cats with no apparent extra-CNS signs will  frequently have normal or near normal blood values on CBC and serum chemistry tests.  

Early neurological signs, when recognized prospectively or retrospectively include licking at floors or walls, sporadic muscle twitches, anisocoria, and vague behavioral and cognitive abnormalities. The suspicion of neurological FIP grows as the neurological signs effect movement. The earliest sign is usually a progressive loss of coordination and balance (ataxia). This is often preceded by a reluctance to jump up or down from high. Incoordination is most noticeable at first in the rear legs but rapidly becomes more generalized. Seizures of the grand mal or psychomotor type may also occur in some cases. Grand mal seizures are manifested by a brief loss of consciousness, severe rhythmic muscle spasms  involving the entire body. Psychomotor epilepsy is associated with varying degrees of consciousness and uncontrolled or partially controlled body movements. 

Cats with secondary neurological FIP present with the usual systemic signs of disease and CNS involvement appears at a later point in the disease. Neurological  disease is a frequent occurrence during antiviral drug treatment for other forms of FIP and is a common cause of relapse in cats treated for the common systemic forms of FIP. These relapses usually occur within the first 1-4 weeks after what appeared to be a successful treatment.  

Spinal cord involvement is frequently overlooked in neurological FIP, although over 50% of cats with inflammatory spinal cord disease have FIP.2  Spinal cord  involvement leads to fecal and/or urinary incontinence of varying severity. Paralysis of tail or hindlegs are also signs of spinal cord disease. Spinal cord involvement is more likely to lead to permanent neurological deficits then disease in the brain. 

Diagnosis- The sudden appearance of neurological abnormalities in cats < 5-7  years of age is strong evidence for FIP based on odds alone, as few other diseases  will produce similar signs in this age group. However, there is a tendency among  veterinarians to put systemic toxoplasmosis higher on their diagnostic list, especially when ocular or CNS signs are observed. Systemic toxoplasmosis in cats is a rare disease compared to FIP and often occurs in immunocompromised hosts,  including those with FIP.15-17  This is understandable, because cats are the definitive host for Toxoplasma gondii in nature and have evolved a state of facultative symbiosis. Furthermore, the major clinical manifestation of systemic toxoplasmosis is a characteristic pneumonia, sometimes associated with hepatitis,  pancreatic necrosis, myositis, myocarditis and dermatitis.3-8 Uveitis, which  resembles that of FIP, is seen in about 10% of cats with systemic toxoplasmosis,4 and encephalitis is even less common.7,17 The diagnostic test for systemic  toxoplasmosis is based on comparing IgG and IgM antibody titers by the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure.3  High IgG titers in the absence of IgM  antibodies indicates previous exposure to toxoplasma, which can be as high as 50% among feral cat populations.4  The presence of high IgM antibody titers is an indication for systemic spread of the organism from the intestine to other tissues and is one requirement for diagnosing systemic disease. However, many cats with ocular and neurological signs are inappropriately treated for systemic toxoplasmosis based only on high IgG titers. FIP and toxoplasmosis have also been described in the same cats.15-17

The diagnosis of the typical systemic forms of FIP is usually made by coupling  information on the age and origin of the cat, historical and physical signs (e.g., ill health, fever, typical abdominal or thoracic effusions, palpable masses in  abdominal organs) with certain laboratory abnormalities in a complete blood count  (anemia; high white blood cell, low lymphocyte, and high neutrophil counts), serum chemistry panel (high total protein, high globulin, low albumin, and low  A:G ratio), examination of effusions when present (exudate or modified exudate, yellow-tinged) and playing the odds that these findings can best be explained by  FIP. A definitive diagnosis can be obtained by identifying coronavirus proteins or  RNA within effusions or samples of diseased tissues by PCR or  immunohistochemistry. However, cats that develop neurological FIP either during  or after treatment for extra-CNS FIP, will often lack many or all of these clinical  features. 

Diagnosis of neurological FIP, especially in the primary form, is usually made in three ways: 1) consider all the historical, clinical and laboratory findings and play the odds that it must be FIP, 2) examine the brain for characteristic signs of FIP by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis,8,9 and 3) treat based on odds that it is neurological FIP and hope for positive response to antiviral drug therapy.

Magnetic resonance imaging with contrast enhancement has become increasingly a test of choice in diagnosing neurological FIP. Dilatation (hydrocephalus) of one or more ventricles is a common lesion in the brain.8,9 Similar dilations in the form of  syringomyelia may also be seen within the spinal cord. Dilatations are secondary to  inflammation of the surrounding ependyma. The ependyma secretes, circulates,  and maintains homeostasis within the CSF pool. Therefore, the severity of the secondary obstructive hydrocephalus of FIP is proportional to the degree of  ependymal inflammation and associated contrast enhancement. Discrete  parenchymal lesions are not identified. MRI adds greatly to the expense of  diagnosis, the required anesthesia adds to the risk of death in severely ill cats, and the expertise and equipment are not always available. Therefore, the ultimate  diagnosis often falls to response to specific antiviral drug therapy. The drug of choice for neurological cases of FIP is GS-441524.9,12 

CSF analysis is an alternative way to quantify the nature and severity of the  inflammation in the ependyma and meninges. CSF protein levels and cell count are  both elevated in cats with FIP, and it is often possible to get appropriate samples to detect infected macrophages either by IHC or PCR.10,11 CSF analysis also carries a  small risk from anesthesia as well as needle puncture into the cisterna magna.  

Treatment- Neurological FIP can be cured if sufficient anti-viral drug passes the  blood-to-brain barrier and the virus has not acquired drug resistance.9,12 Field tests  with the viral protease inhibitor GS376 were the first to show that neurological  signs can be greatly suppressed but the infection not cured. The reason was assumed to be the inability to get high enough levels of GC376 into the CNS.  Greater success in curing cats with neurological FIP was obtained with the nucleoside analog and viral RNA transcription inhibitor GS-441524. 9,12 GS 441524 was shown to enter the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at levels ranging from 7- 21% of the blood (compared to 3% for GC376), depending on the cat tested.13 This  variation in the blood-to-brain barrier between cats is the probable explanation for  the variable dosages of GS-441524, from 4 to 10 mg/kg daily, required to cure  naturally occurring cases of neurological FIP.9,12 

The present starting dosage for GS-441524 has been set at 10 mg/kg daily by the  subcutaneous route based on a recent report.Although, it is possible to treat some  cats at lower dosages,9,12 there is no easy way to measure the strength of the blood to-brain barrier, so the lowest dosage that will be curative for the most cats is used.  The success of treatment is measured by both improvement in clinical signs and  when present, improvement in critical abnormal blood test values. Weight gain and  quality of coat are also important qualitative signs to monitor. Sequential MRI and  CSF analyses will provide more direct evidence of treatment response,9 but are  impractical in most cases.  

Improvement in general health and neurological signs usually occurs within 24-48  hours and most cats destined for a full recovery will return to normal function in 4- 6 weeks. However, a significant proportion of cats will respond slower and require  a re-evaluation of their clinical and blood test status every 4 weeks. A slow down in progress, either clinically or in reversal in initial blood test abnormalities will  require increases in drug dosage from +2 to +5 mg/kg daily.9,12 

The end of treatment, which is usually 84 days, is not always easy to confirm.  Typical blood test abnormalities that are used in most other forms of FIP are either  not present at the time of diagnosis or returned to normal before the treatment ends.  Permanent neurological abnormalities may persist even after the infection has been  cured and confuse the clinical evaluation. Without MRI and/or CSF analysis to confirm whether the disease as gone, the only remaining option is to stop treatment  and hope that a relapse will not occur.  

Complications of neurological FIP- Relapses in cats treated for neurological FIP  usually occur within days following the end of treatment and are due to either  inadequate dosage and/or the acquisition of drug resistance. The incidence of  relapses somewhat higher than following treatment of extra-CNS forms of FIP.  Under-dosing may result from stronger blood-to-brain barrier in some cats than  others, poor quality antiviral drug, or miscalculation of the dosage. However, most cats can be cured on retreatment providing drug resistance has not developed.  

The acquisition of drug resistance is well known for antiviral drugs used in humans  for diseases like HIV/AIDS. It has also been recognized for both GC37611,14 and  GS-441524 in cats.12 Drug resistance can occur by mutations in either the parent  FECV or in its mutant FIP biotype in nature14, and manifest by a poor initial  response to treatment, but this is uncommon.12 Resistance is more likely to occur  during treatment and is facilitated by both chronic exposure to the drug and lower  sub-inhibitory drug levels. Drug resistance is usually partial and can often be  overcome by increasing the dosage. Drug resistance can occasionally increase over  time, negating any effect of the higher dosage.  

Cats with neurological FIP may be left with residual damage to brain and/or spinal  cord and permanent disabilities. Disabilities include varying degrees of  incoordination, behavioral changes, and dementia. The most troublesome disabilities result from involvement of the spinal cord. The spinal cord is encased  in a boney tube that does not allow for much expansion in cases of inflammation or  a form of syringomyelia. Spinal cord involvement in FIP is frequently manifested  by varying degrees of fecal and/or urinary incontinence. Paralysis of the rear legs  and tail are also observed. Unfortunately, these clinical abnormalities are often permanent, especially when the neurological disease goes untreated for a long  time.  

One of the most common negative outcomes of antiviral drug therapy in cats with  neurological FIP is a failure to achieve a cure, even though continued treatment at  a high dosage still allows a sustainable quality of life (i.e., control of disease signs without a cure). This situation indicates that inhibiting virus replication with  antiviral drugs may be insufficient to cure an infection and that an effective  immune response is also required. This phenomenon of “treatment without cure” has led many owners to continue treatment at all costs for periods over a year in some cases. It has also led to much experimentation with ultra-high dosages of GS 441524 (>15 mg/kg daily), split doses, switches from injections to oral treatment,  simultaneous oral and injectable treatment, combined antiviral drug therapy (e.g.,  GS-441424 plus GC376), and augmentation of the antiviral drug treatment with  high dosage corticosteroids and other immunosuppressives. A cure is occasionally  claimed for such treatments, but the outcome for most of these cats has been bad.  

There is indirect evidence that host immunity to FIP is compartmentalized between  CNS and extra-CNS parts of the body. The incidence of CNS involvement appears  to increase when extra-CNS infection is inhibited by GS-441524.12 Therefore, active extra-CNS disease appears to have an inhibitory effect on disease in the  CNS. Cats presenting with pure neurological disease often do not have abnormal  blood test values in both CBC and serum chemistry panel, even with significant  inflammatory changes in the CSF.8 Cats with neurological FIP often have the  highest serum, and hence CSF antibody titers, by IFA than other forms of FIP.8 These are all evidence for “compartmentalization” of infection on one or the other  side of the blood-to-brain barrier.  


  1. Pedersen NC. 2009. A review of feline infectious peritonitis virus infection:  1963-2008. J Feline Med Surg 11:225-58.
  2. Marioni-Henry K. Feline spinal cord diseases. Vet Clin No Am Small Anim  Pract. 2010;40:1011–1028.
  3. Pedersen NC. Toxoplasmosis. In: Feline Infectious Diseases. American  Veterinary Publications, Inc., Goleta, CA, USA, 1988, pp 372-380.
  4. Petrak M, Carpenter J. Feline toxoplasmosis. J Am Vet Assoc. 1965; 146:728- 734.
  5. Jokelainen P, Simola O, Rantanen E, Nareaho A, Lohi H, Sukura A. Feline  toxoplasmosis in Finland: Cross-sectional epidemiological study and case series  study. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2012; 24:1115–1124.
  6. Henriksen P, Dietz HH, Henriksen SA. Fatal toxoplasmosis in five cats. Vet  Parasitol. 1994;55:15-20.
  7. Holzworth J. Encephalitic toxoplasmosis in a cat. J Am Vet Assoc. 1954;  124:313-316.
  1. Foley JE, Lapointe JM, Koblik P, Poland A, Pedersen NC Diagnostic features of  clinical neurologic feline infectious peritonitis. J Vet Intern Med. 1998;12:415-423.
  2. Dickinson PJ, Bannasch M, Thomasy SM, Murthy VD, Vernau KM, Liepnieks M, Montgomery E, Knickelbein KE, Murphy B, Pedersen NC. Antiviral treatment  using the adenosine nucleoside analogue GS‐441524 in cats with clinically  diagnosed neurological feline infectious peritonitis. J Vet Intern Med. 2020;  34:1587–1593.
  3. Ives EJ, Vanhaesebrouck AE, Cian F. 2013. Immunocytochemical  demonstration of feline infectious peritonitis virus within cerebrospinal fluid  macrophages. J Feline Med Surg. 2013;15:1149–1153.
  4. Pedersen NC, Kim Y, Liu H, Galasiti Kankanamalage AC, Eckstrand C,  Groutas WC, Bannasch M, Meadows JM, Chang KO. Efficacy of a 3C-like  protease inhibitor in treating various forms of acquired feline infectious peritonitis.  J Feline Med Surg. 2018;20:378-392.
  5. Pedersen NC, Perron M, Bannasch M, et al. Efficacy and safety of the  nucleoside analog GS-441524 for treatment of cats with naturally occurring feline  infectious peritonitis. J Feline Med Surg. 2019;21:271-281.
  6. Murphy BG, Perron M, Murakami E, et al. The nucleoside analog GS-441524  strongly inhibits feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) virus in tissue culture and  experimental cat infection studies. Vet Microbiol. 2018;219:226-233.
  7. Perera KD, Rathnayake AD, Liu H, Pedersen NC, Groutas WC, Chang KO,  Kim Y. Characterization of amino acid substitutions in feline coronavirus 3C-like  protease from a cat with feline infectious peritonitis treated with a protease  inhibitor. Vet Microbiol. 2019;237:108398.
  8. Ward, B.C. and Pedersen, N.C.: Infectious Peritonitis in Cats. J Am Vet Med.  1969;154:26-35.
  9. Toomey JM, Carlisle-Nowak MM, Barr SC, Lopez JW, French TW, Scott FW,  Hoose W, Pizano S, Dubey JP. Concurrent toxoplasmosis and feline infectious  peritonitis in a cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1995;31:425-428.
  10. 17. Zandonà L, Brunetta R, Zanardello C, Vascellari M, Persico L, Mazzolini E.  Cerebral toxoplasmosis in a cat with feline leukemia and feline infectious  peritonitis viral infections. Can Vet J. 2018;59:860-862
Categories: Dr. Pedersen